ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2026
Clinical translation and landscape of copper nanoparticles.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review on Copper Oxide Nanoparticles: Physicochemical Parameters, Pharmacological Potential and Pathophysiological Effects.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although the medical use of copper dates back millennia and medicines based on copper nanoparticles have been employed for over a century, their benefits are still often questioned. Over the past three decades, advances in nanotechnology have renewed interest in copper-based nanoformulations for healthcare. While most preclinical studies have focused on systemically administered copper nanomedicines for a broad range of therapeutic purposes, clinical trials remain scarce and are primarily centered on topical applications, where long-term off-target accumulation can be minimized to mitigate safety concerns. Despite exhibiting only moderate antiseptic activity compared with other inorganic nanomaterials, copper nanoparticles demonstrate significant wound healing potential through complex mechanisms involving angiogenesis promotion and stabilization of extracellular skin proteins. In this work, we discuss the current landscape of copper nanoparticles (and related microparticulate structures), and we thoroughly analyze the characteristics that have enabled their translation and use in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.