Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41795041›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026

Burden and Predictors of Repeat Diagnostic Upper Endoscopy for Abdominal Pain, Heartburn, and Dysphagia in General Gastroenterology.

Priya Kathuria, Eric D Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Priya KathuriaDivision of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
Eric D ShahDivision of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA. ershah@umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEndoscopy access is limited nationwide.

aimsWe aimed to characterize the burden of repeated upper endoscopies for indications of abdominal pain, heartburn, and dysphagia.

methodsWe reviewed all patients undergoing diagnostic endoscopy in a large health system between 2000 and 2023 who did not have medical conditions requiring repeat endoscopy. A Cox model was developed to predict the hazard of repeating a diagnostic endoscopy within three years as a primary outcome, represented using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsOver a 23 year period, three-fifths of all diagnostic upper endoscopies performed were for abdominal pain (n = 5176), heartburn (n = 1535), or dysphagia (n = 3266). 90% of these procedures were ordered by gastroenterologists. The endoscopy was repeated within three years in 4.4% of patients with abdominal pain, 4.3% of patients with heartburn, and 5.6% of patients with dysphagia, usually for the same indication as the original procedure and without any intervention performed. In a multivariable model, the risk of repeating an endoscopy was either not influenced or only weakly influenced by age, sex, and mortality risk (measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index). Findings were similar regardless of the dominant gastrointestinal symptom complaint. Gastroenterologists were no less likely to order a repeat endoscopy than primary care. Most repeat endoscopies occurred within one year of the index endoscopy.

conclusionAn average gastroenterologist performs a repeat diagnostic upper endoscopy almost every day.

Indexed as

Abdominal PainDeglutition DisordersEndoscopy, GastrointestinalGastroenterologyHeartburnAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesHealth system organizationLow-value careOpen accessValue-based care

Identifiers

PMID41795041
PMCPMC13144265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.