ArticleScientific reports2026
Enhanced forecasting of friction and cohesion of augmented unsaturated soil with nanostructured quarry fines (NQF) addition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shear strength parameters such as friction angle and cohesion are fundamental to solving geotechnical engineering problems related to slope stability, foundation design, and earthwork construction. This study presents the prediction of friction angle (Fi) and cohesion (Nc) of an unsaturated lateritic soil using three intelligent learning techniques: Support Vector Machine (SVM), Radial Basis Function (RBF), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), with Linear Multivariate Regression (LMR) adopted as a baseline model to evaluate agreement between input and output variables. The motivation for employing machine learning approaches stems from the limitations of complex laboratory testing and the need for reliable predictive tools that can support design and field applications. The investigated soil, classified as A-7-6 and poorly graded, exhibited coefficients of uniformity and curvature of 2.05 and 0.84, respectively. It was characterized by high plasticity and significant clay content, with a clay fraction of 23.02%, clay activity of 2, friction angle of 15°, maximum dry density of 1.84 g/cm3 at an optimum moisture content of 16.2%, and was tested under cyclic direct shear conditions. Multiple datasets were generated from varying treatment conditions and soil descriptors, forming the basis for model development. Eleven input parameters were used to predict Fi and Nc, and model performance was evaluated using Variance Accounted For (VAF), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and coefficient of determination (R2). The results indicate that RBF and MLP outperformed SVM and LMR in both training and testing phases for predicting cohesion and friction angle, demonstrating superior generalization capability. Sensitivity analysis using the Cosine Domain Method revealed that unsaturated unit weight had the greatest influence on friction angle prediction, while clay content was the most influential parameter for cohesion. Among all models, MLP achieved the highest accuracy and overall predictive performance. Based on this optimal model, a Graphical User Interface was developed to enable users to input soil parameters and obtain rapid predictions, providing a practical tool for researchers and practitioners in geotechnical engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.