ReviewDiscover mental health2026
A scoping review of counselling and psychological intervention models in low income nations.
Review in Discover mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There has been a persistent lack of synthesized knowledge on mental health treatment models that attune to the realities of low-income countries at large. To address this significant mental health knowledge gap, this scoping review tries to identify and synthesize the literature on psychological intervention models developed for or adapted to these contexts. After conducting a thorough search of academic databases, we went through a two-stage screening process to identify relevant articles. From those eligible studies, we collected and organized data on various theoretical and therapeutic counseling models, synthesizing the information into clear themes. The 42 included articles revealed five primary model categories: (1) Task-Shifting and Simplification, (2) Indigenous and Culturally-Grounded, (3) Systems-Level and Meta-Models, (4) Cultural Adaptation Frameworks, and (5) Technology-Based Delivery. The results indicate evidence base for the effectiveness of task-shifting simplified Western therapies and a growing movement toward validating indigenous psychologies. The findings demonstrate a clear shift toward pragmatic and culturally grounded interventions. Task-shifting is proven to be a promising approach in the field, but its effectiveness depends on having intense supervision. It is vital for research to focus on making the strategies sustainable for the long run, assessing their economic effectiveness, and comparing different models to see what works best for low-income nations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.