ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2026
The Gallery Walk as a method for patient and public involvement in health research: a case study in dementia care.
Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundParticipatory and transdisciplinary approaches in health research continue to face challenges such as disciplinary silos, power asymmetries, and a lack of accessible formats that enable meaningful dialogue among researchers, practitioners, and individuals with lived experience. This study examines the Gallery Walk as a participatory method in health research, using a workshop on diversity and social position in dementia care to reflect on its potential, limitations, and suitability.
methodsTwenty participants — researchers, practitioners, individuals living with dementia, and family caregivers — took part in a Gallery Walk across four themed stations. Contributions were documented on flipcharts to support iterative and cumulative discussion, followed by a plenary synthesis.
resultsThe Gallery Walk facilitated exchange among heterogeneous groups, supported iterative knowledge building, and generated practice-oriented recommendations. Implementation challenges included the need for careful preparation, skilled facilitation, and adequate resources for documentation and analysis. DISCUSSION: The use of the Gallery Walk Walk in this workshop demonstrates its significant potential as a participatory and interdisciplinary method in health research. By rotating through thematic stations, engaging with visual content, and iteratively addressing key questions, participants were able to incorporate diverse disciplinary and experiential perspectives. This approach fostered the development of practical recommendations and ensured the meaningful involvement of individuals with dementia and their families. The findings highlight that the Gallery Walk's accessibility and focus on visual elements promote discussion, encourage continuous reflection, and increase transparency by visibly tracking contributions.
conclusionThe Gallery Walk represents a promising and adaptable format for participatory, transdisciplinary health research when supported by intentional design, inclusive facilitation, and rigorous reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.