ArticleScientific reports2026
Perceptions, attitudes, practices, and barriers towards research in standardized training of laboratory medicine trainees: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess research perceptions, current practices, barriers, and training needs among trainees in a standardized laboratory medicine training program, and to provide evidence to support research capacity building within the training system. A cross-sectional survey was administered to all 56 trainees (32 first-year and 24 s-year) in the Department of Laboratory Medicine at West China Second University Hospital using an anonymous online questionnaire. Trainees generally recognized the value of research, with all participants acknowledging its role in enhancing competitiveness and critical thinking. However, positive perceptions declined from the first to the second training year. The agreement scores regarding research "helpful solve clinical problems" declined significantly from 4.38 ± 0.50 to 3.71 ± 0.75 (P < 0.001). Similarly, scores for "important part of profession" decreased from 4.41 ± 0.50 to 3.88 ± 0.68 (P < 0.01), and scores for "improve thinking" also dropped from 4.47 ± 0.51 to 4.13 ± 0.34 (P < 0.01). Regarding research practice, although more than half of the trainees had participated in basic activities such as data collection and literature retrieval, none had authored or published a scientific paper. Major barriers included insufficient training, limited mentor guidance, and uncertainty about how to begin. Case reports were the most preferred type of research project. Training needs were pronounced, with more than 75% of trainees expressing strong demand for introductory research courses, literature search training, academic writing courses, and one-on-one guidance. The strongest preference for training format was direct participation in mentor-guided research. Although laboratory medicine trainees hold positive perceptions of research, their practical involvement remains limited to rudimentary activities. The main barriers lie in the lack of research training and mentor guidance. Therefore, it is recommended to implement research training and a mentorship system within the training program to enhance trainees' research capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.