ArticleScientific reports2026
Study on establishment of cardiovascular interventional disease database and prediction of postoperative mortality risk.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In order to solve the problems of missing, discontinuous, and unstructured data in past cardiovascular interventional studies, this work constructed a database of specific cardiovascular interventional diseases. Within one year of its implementation in a top-three hospital in Zhejiang Province, the database collected a total of 728 cases of cardiovascular interventional patients, realizing the structuring of patient data and 360° whole-cycle management. With the support of a specific disease database, we proposed an improved LSTM-BLS model to predict the risk of death after cardiovascular interventions. Compared with the traditional long-short term memory (LSTM) model, the parallel learning structure-width learning system (BLS) was introduced to calculate the weights directly, which can solve the problems of overfitting and delay caused by the deep structure of LSTM, so as to improve the accuracy of prediction. The experimental results showed that the accuracy rate of the proposed model was 87.46%, the precision was 90.74%, and recall rate was 93.61%, which can objectively reflect the postoperative death risk of patients, and help doctors to make timely medical intervention for patients with high death risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.