ArticleScientific reports2026
Experimental and numerical investigation of single-slope solar still performance enhanced by porous absorbing materials: thermal, economic, and environmental assessments.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low freshwater productivity and poor thermal efficiency remain key limitations of conventional single-slope solar stills. In this study, porous absorbing materials are investigated as passive performance-enhancement strategies for small-scale solar desalination. A combined experimental and numerical analysis was conducted on a traditional solar still (TSS) and two modified configurations incorporating melamine sponge (MSSS) and pumice stone (VPSSS), operated under real climatic conditions in Karbala, Iraq. The results demonstrate that the MSSS achieved the highest daily freshwater yield of 1347 mL/day, corresponding to a 56.9% increase compared with the TSS, alongside an average thermal efficiency of 49.3%. The VPSSS produced 1055 mL/day, representing a 22.9% improvement and a thermal efficiency of 38.2%. Economic analysis indicates that, under optimal operating conditions, the MSSS reduced the water production cost to 0.07569 USD/L with a payback period of approximately 2.5 years. The energy payback period ranged from 0.55 to 0.86 years, whereas the exergy recovery period remained considerably longer (28–35 years), highlighting inherent thermodynamic limitations. In addition, the MSSS configuration achieved an annual CO2 emission reduction of approximately 1612 kg, corresponding to a cost saving of 17.36 USD. Overall, the findings suggest that porous absorbing materials, particularly melamine sponge, offer an effective and economically feasible approach for enhancing solar still performance in arid and remote regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.