Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41794895›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2026

The effects of music and virtual reality on pain and anxiety during central venous port implantation: a randomised clinical trial.

Abdelmalek Ghimouz, Sylvain Dureau, Matthieu Carton, Alexandra Gomola, Ziad Fadel, Kim Khanh Thuong, Jane Muret

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT04804735 (Use of Virtual Reality Mask or Music Therapy for Analgesia and Anxiolytic Purpose When Totally Implanted Venous Access Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04804735 nacompletednot on this map

Use of Virtual Reality Mask or Music Therapy for Analgesia and Anxiolytic Purpose When Totally Implanted Venous Access Device (IVAD) for Chemotherapy Under Local Anesthesia

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut CurieRan2022 to 2023Enrolled127ConditionsImplanted Venous Access DeviceArmsREV : local anesthesia and virtual reality, MUS : local anesthesia and music therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abdelmalek GhimouzDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005, France. abdelmalek.ghimouz@curie.fr.
Sylvain DureauDepartement of Statistics. Institut Curie Paris, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005, France.
Matthieu CartonDepartement of Statistics. Institut Curie Paris, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005, France.
Alexandra GomolaDepartement of Anaesthesia, Intensive care, and Pain. Institut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, Saint Cloud, 92210, France.
Ziad FadelDepartement of Anaesthesia, Intensive care, and Pain. Institut Curie, 35, Rue Dailly, Saint Cloud, 92210, France.
Kim Khanh ThuongDepartement of Anaesthesia. Institut Gustave Roussy, 114, Rue Edouard Vaillant, Villejuif, 94800, France.
Jane MuretDepartment of Anaesthesia, Intensive Care, and Pain, Institut Curie, 26, rue d'Ulm, Paris, 75005, France. jane.muret@curie.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The value of music (MUS) and virtual reality (VR) in reducing pain or anxiety during central venous port implantation (CVPI) is controversial. We conducted a randomised multicenter controlled trial in 127 patients who received either MUS (38) or VR (38) during CVPI compared to standard (STAND) group (51). The primary outcome was a co-criterion related to pain or anxiety experienced during CVPI assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale. Pain and anxiety were considered independently. The secondary outcomes were the tolerance of the MUS and VR devices, patient satisfaction, and the correlation between mean pain scores and Analgesia Nociceptive Index scores (ANI). There were no differences in pain or anxiety between MUS and STAND. Mean pain was 3.3 ± 2.2 (SD) vs. 3.3 ± 2.6; (P > 0.9) and mean anxiety was 4.4 ± 2.8 vs. 4.2 ± 3.1; (P = 0.6). There were no differences in pain or anxiety between VR and STAND. Pain was 3.6 ± 2.3 vs. 3.3 ± 2.6; (P = 0.5) and anxiety was 3.2 ± 2.3 vs. 4.2 ± 3.1; (P = 0.11). The MUS and VR devices were well tolerated. Patients were very satisfied. No correlation was observed between pain scores and ANI scores in the three groups. The use of MUS or VR during CVPI had no beneficial effect on reducing pain or anxiety.Trial resgistration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04804735; Registred on 16/03/2021.

Indexed as

AnxietyCatheterization, Central VenousMusicMusic TherapyPainPain ManagementVirtual RealityAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatient SatisfactionAnxietyCentral venous portMusicPainVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID41794895
PMCPMC13087018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.