ArticleScientific reports2026
Social encapsulation of parasite eggs by honeybee colonies.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eusocial insect colonies can choose different behaviours to combat the same parasites. While honeybee (HB), Apis mellifera, colonies remove eggs and larvae of parasitic small hive beetles (SHB), Aethina tumida, they encapsulate adults in propolis. It is currently unknown whether there is flexibility in this system. Here, we show encapsulation of eggs by colonies as an alternative to removal. Oviposition sites with or without SHB eggs were introduced into HB field colonies of mixed European origin. After 24 h, sites were removed to measure the propolised area and to quantify the remaining eggs. Further, SHB egg laying depth, and HB worker proboscis length and thickness, were measured. Even though the proboscises were long enough to reach most eggs, the number of eggs before and after introduction did not differ. Instead, HB used more propolis on sites with eggs compared to controls. This suggests decision making by colonies for either egg removal or encapsulation and demonstrates considerable flexibility in social immunity. Such flexibility probably contributes to eusocial insect resilience and calls for efforts to understand colony decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.