ArticleScientific reports2026
Co-designed principles for establishment of a virtual hospital.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Factors Influencing the Implementation of a Multispecialty Virtual Ward Program in the United Kingdom: Qualitative Exploration of Staff Experiences and Perspectives.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We aimed to inform design and implementation of a new Australian private virtual hospital by establishing co-designed principles to inform a ten-year vision. This qualitative pre-implementation co-design study used an implementation science approach informed by the PERCS framework. Three workshops were held, one face-to-face in Brisbane, Australia, and two online. In each workshop, results of a prior barriers/enablers/considerations study were presented and critiqued by participants, followed by activities in focus groups. Thirty-six stakeholders from metropolitan, regional and rural areas participated including consumers, carers, health and aged care leadership, nurses, allied health providers, general practitioners, researchers, and public health stakeholders. There was strong enthusiasm, with some reservations such as clinical safety concerns. Four strong themes emerged: (1) Take the care to the patient; (2) Virtual is the mechanism, the care is real; (3) Be ambitious, but build a strong foundation; (4) Build the right workforce. These themes were repeated across all workshops, indicating good reliability of results. The strongest overall messages were the need for authentically patient centred care and safety. Four principles were developed from the workshop data, with “safety first” underpinning all principles. Using an implementation science-informed, pre-implementation co-design approach led to stakeholder enthusiasm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.