Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41794867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Co-designed principles for establishment of a virtual hospital.

Olivia J Fisher, Belinda Moshi, Kelly McGrath, Andrew Barron, Shanthi Kanagarajah, Ian Smith, Sue-Ellen Smith, Elizabeth Martin, Wendell Cockshaw, Caroline Grogan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olivia J FisherWesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia. olivia.fisher@cdu.edu.au.
Belinda MoshiWesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Kelly McGrathWesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Andrew BarronWesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
Shanthi KanagarajahQueensland Physician Care, Brisbane, Australia.
Ian SmithSt Andrew's War Memorial Hospital, Spring Hill, Australia.
Sue-Ellen SmithBlueCare Community, Brisbane, Australia.
Elizabeth MartinDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Wendell CockshawFaculty of Health, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia.
Caroline GroganWesley Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

UnitingCare Queensland Not Applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to inform design and implementation of a new Australian private virtual hospital by establishing co-designed principles to inform a ten-year vision. This qualitative pre-implementation co-design study used an implementation science approach informed by the PERCS framework. Three workshops were held, one face-to-face in Brisbane, Australia, and two online. In each workshop, results of a prior barriers/enablers/considerations study were presented and critiqued by participants, followed by activities in focus groups. Thirty-six stakeholders from metropolitan, regional and rural areas participated including consumers, carers, health and aged care leadership, nurses, allied health providers, general practitioners, researchers, and public health stakeholders. There was strong enthusiasm, with some reservations such as clinical safety concerns. Four strong themes emerged: (1) Take the care to the patient; (2) Virtual is the mechanism, the care is real; (3) Be ambitious, but build a strong foundation; (4) Build the right workforce. These themes were repeated across all workshops, indicating good reliability of results. The strongest overall messages were the need for authentically patient centred care and safety. Four principles were developed from the workshop data, with “safety first” underpinning all principles. Using an implementation science-informed, pre-implementation co-design approach led to stakeholder enthusiasm.

Indexed as

HospitalsAustraliaFocus GroupsHumansImplementation SciencePatient-Centered Care

Identifiers

PMID41794867
PMCPMC13087229

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.