ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2026
The hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and fungi in oil contaminated soils of Kazakhstan: microbiome composition, enrichment, isolation and bioremediation potential.
Article in Environmental microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Analysis of Paired Crude Oil and Produced Water Reveals Stress-Tolerant Hydrocarbon-Degrading Bacteria with Bioremediation Potential.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Soil Bacterial Community Structure and Functional Potential in the Caspian Drylands of Western Kazakhstan.Biology · 2026Article
- Enhanced Barley Growth in Petroleum-Contaminated Soil Mediated by Xanthan-like Exopolysaccharide ofMicroorganisms · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOil contamination in soils causes significant environmental impacts and risks to human health. Oil components can be naturally reduced by indigenous microorganisms, that are able to degrade such substrates. We used culture-independent and culture-dependent methods to examine the prokaryotic and the eukaryotic microbiome of different heavily oil contaminated soils in Kazakhstan. Bacteria and fungi were enriched and isolated from four soils contaminated with crude oil or hydrocarbons. Aliphatic, aromatic and condensed aromatic model hydrocarbons of crude oil and crude oil itself were used as substrates for the enrichment and the isolation experiments. The enrichment process was accompanied by culture-independent tests.
resultsThe results of the Illumina sequencing of the contaminated soils and the enrichment cultures were compared with the results of the culture-dependent isolation and determination of bacterial, yeast and filamentous fungal strains. The majority of these 110 strains from 45 different genera belong to well-described hydrocarbon degraders like Bacilli and Rhodococci as well as to Achromobacter, Gordonia, Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Aspergillus, Exophiala, Fusarium, Meyerozyma, Penicillium and Trichoderma species. The most abundant species was the ascomycetal yeast Meyerozyma guilliermondii followed by strains of the bacterial genus Peribacillus. Furthermore, we combined the microbiome insights on the enrichment procedures and the isolation of bacteria, yeasts and filamentous fungi with the in-fact degradation potential of the isolated species based on substrate consumption and metabolite formation. In addition to the well-described hydrocarbon degraders, the utilization spectrum of less-studied strains of the genera Leifsonia, Neorhizobium, Purpureocillium, Rhodotorula and Sarocladium could be broadened.
conclusionIn the end a complex overview of the indigenous microorganisms and their degradation ability of crude oil components emerged and demonstrates the great potential of bioremediation for Kazakhstan soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.