ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Quality of end-of-life care among individuals with and without dementia: a Swedish registry-based study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite dementia being a leading cause of death and clinical guidelines recommending palliative care, substantial gaps in care quality for this population have previously been shown. This study aimed to investigate and compare the quality of end-of-life (EOL) care provided to individuals with and without dementia in different settings.
methodsIn this registry-based study, patients registered in the Swedish Register of Palliative Care (SRPC) between 2011 and 2020 were cross-referenced with patients in the Swedish registry for cognitive/dementia disorders (SveDem). For each patient with dementia registered in SveDem (n = 39 712), two controls without dementia matched by year of birth and gender were selected from the SRPC (n = 79 336). Quality indicators in the SRPC were analyzed by group (dementia/controls) and by place of death, separately, using the chi-squared test. Multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between the quality indicators and having a diagnosis of dementia or not, overall and in different settings.
resultsIndividuals with dementia were more likely to have staff or family members present at death, to receive documented decisions to shift to EOL care, have symptom assessments made the final week of life and prescription of injectables. However, they were less likely to express preferences for place of death and to be informed about EOL care transitions, especially in hospitals without specialized palliative care.
conclusionsIn this study, individuals with dementia received higher quality EOL care in several domains compared with those without dementia. However, they were less likely to have expressed preferences for place of death. These findings highlight the need for early, proactive care planning to align care with patient preferences and avoid potentially non-beneficial actions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.