Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41794788›Full record

ArticleConflict and health2026

Strengthening and sustaining gender-based violence (GBV) coordination in emergencies: a synthesis of practitioner-driven, globally applicable recommendations.

Philomena Raftery, Alina Potts, Melanie Hyde, Yermeyn York Wuyke, Hira Hashmey, Liliane Munezero, Ligia Kiss, Mazeda Hossain, Jennifer Palmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conflict and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philomena RafteryDepartment of Global Health & Development and Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK. philomena.raftery@alumni.lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2683-7154
Alina PottsThe Global Women's Institute at the George Washington University, Washington DC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3787-3679
Melanie HydeTechnical Officer, Gender Equality, Health Equity and Human Rights, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yermeyn York WuykeGBV/PSEAH specialist, Gender based violence area of responsibility (GBV AoR), Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2833-4656
Hira HashmeyGBV Specialist, United Nations population fund (UNFPA), Abuja, Nigeria.
Liliane MunezeroGBV Specialist, United Nations population fund (UNFPA), Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Ligia KissDepartment of Global Health & Development and Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK. l.kiss@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3334-7110
Mazeda HossainSchool of Social Sciences and the Eastern Africa Centre, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1878-8145
Jennifer PalmerDepartment of Global Health & Development and Health in Humanitarian Crises Centre, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7777-722X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGender-based violence (GBV) is a global public health and human rights crisis, requiring coordinated efforts to ensure effective prevention, risk mitigation, and response, particularly in emergencies. Despite policy commitments underlining the importance of addressing GBV in emergencies, funding remains insufficient, inconsistent, and poorly aligned with aid prioritisation in the changing humanitarian and global health financing landscape. This paper synthesizes evidence on GBV coordination in humanitarian and public health emergencies and presents global recommendations to inform policy and practice in the context of the ongoing Humanitarian Reset.

methodsUsing a three-phase qualitative methodology—comprising evidence synthesis, case study analysis, and a global expert practitioner consultation—we developed a framework and present strategic recommendations to strengthen and sustain GBV coordination in emergencies.

resultsOur findings identify seven strategic recommendations aimed at investing in, sustaining, and transforming GBV coordination efforts globally. Key investment priorities include expanding the GBV coordination workforce, including for risk mitigation, prioritizing and systematically addressing GBV within public health emergencies, and investing in information management systems and strategic research. To sustain GBV coordination, we recommend adapting funding models, diversifying financial sources, advancing national leadership and localization, and implementing context-specific coordination approaches, including at the sub-national level. Furthermore, we propose that emergencies can serve as catalysts for broader social and legal transformations that advance GBV prevention and gender equality.

conclusionRather than accepting the deprioritisation of GBV coordination as an inevitable consequence of funding reductions framed as efficiency gains, our findings underscore the critical value of maintaining a dedicated focus on GBV within humanitarian coordination. Our findings provide practical, evidence-based recommendations and a global framework for policymakers, donors, and practitioners to strengthen and sustain GBV coordination in diverse emergency contexts. Sustained progress will require collective commitment to address GBV, even as funding landscapes change, and the backlash against gender equality continues to intensify.

Indexed as

GBV coordinationGender-based violenceHumanitarian emergenciesPublic health emergencies

Identifiers

PMID41794788
PMCPMC13001181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.