ArticleIrish veterinary journal2026
Retrospective study of tongue gangrene in Egyptian buffaloes and its surgical management.
Article in Irish veterinary journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTongue gangrene is a rare but serious condition in buffaloes. Despite its clinical and economic importance, it remains poorly documented in Egypt. This retrospective study evaluated the clinical presentation, etiological factors, histopathological findings, and surgical outcomes of tongue gangrene in Egyptian buffaloes.
methodsForty-four buffaloes examined between January 2022 and November 2025 were classified based on the extent of tongue loss, as determined by the length (cm) of the excised gangrenous segment. Microbiological analyses included culture of deep tissue samples from the demarcation zone and rice straw samples taken from the batches fed to affected buffaloes on their farms of origin. Viral RNA was extracted from affected tongue tissues, and FMDV detection and serotyping were performed using RT-PCR targeting the 5′UTR and VP1 regions. Sequenced PCR products were analyzed using BLAST and phylogenetic reconstruction. Partial glossectomy was performed in all cases, and recovery was monitored for up to 24 weeks based on medical records.
resultsThe buffaloes showed systemic illness with fever and dehydration, along with characteristic dry tongue gangrene (discoloration, foul odor, loss of sensation, and a clear demarcation line). Most cases (31/44) had a recent history suggestive of FMD; the remaining cases were classified as suspected traumatic tongue injury (9/44) or no identified predisposing factor (4/44). Deep tongue tissue cultures yielded bacterial growth in 24/44 and fungal growth in 3/44 cases (presumptive identification), while rice straw samples yielded Fusarium-like fungi (12/44) and clostridia-like organisms (28/44). Histopathology confirmed coagulative necrosis with vascular congestion, bacterial colonization, and neutrophilic infiltration. FMDV serotype O was detected, showing ~ 98% identity by BLAST and clustering within the ME-SA topotype near Egy/Qalyubia/2021. Recovery time correlated significantly with the extent of tongue loss (p < 0.05): the shortest recovery was observed after ~ 5 cm loss, intermediate recovery after ~ 8 cm loss, and the longest recovery among survivors after ~ 10 cm loss.
conclusionTongue gangrene in the studied Egyptian buffaloes was most likely associated with recent FMD infection and/or traumatic tongue injuries, which may predispose to microlesions and subsequent microbial invasion. Clostridia-like organisms and Fusarium-like fungi were cultured from deep tongue tissue and from rice straw offered to the affected animals. Early diagnosis and prompt surgical intervention remain essential for successful outcomes and improved survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.