ArticleNature communications2026
High-resolution, high-throughput detection of hidden antibiotic resistance with the dilution-and-delay (DnD) susceptibility assay.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond susceptibility results: understanding the clinical and diagnostic burden of bacterial heteroresistance.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Bacteriophage Heteroresistance as a Cause of Treatment Failure in Urinary Tract Infections.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Beyond resistance and tolerance: rethinking evolutionary responses to antibiotics from the perspective of individual bacterial cells.Nature communications · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rising rates of antibiotic treatment failure highlight the complexity of resistance mechanisms. While genetically encoded resistance is well established, recent clinical studies have uncovered noncanonical mechanisms driven by phenotypic heterogeneity, such as heteroresistance, persistence, or adaptive resistance. Yet, standard susceptibility tests lack the resolution or throughput to detect these diverse phenotypic mechanisms. To address these limitations, we develop a scalable, high-resolution assay-Dilution-and-Delay (DnD)-by implementing two basic principles of bacterial growth. DnD detects rare drug-insensitive cells at frequencies as low as 1 in 100 million, while also reporting bulk population inhibition as the conventional MIC. We demonstrate this capability across synthetic communities, heteroresistance, persistence, and evolutionary progression. These high-resolution data expose how traditional susceptibility assays are constrained by statistical detection limits. Scaling up DnD for high-throughput application to ~120 clinical isolates reveals that under-the-radar multidrug resistance or tolerance is common. By combining resolution with scalability, DnD provides an advanced platform for antibiotic susceptibility testing with broad impact on basic research, clinical practice, and epidemiological surveillance. It supports a new framework for measuring, defining, and understanding antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.