ArticleFluids and barriers of the CNS2026
Quantifying cerebrospinal fluid flow in pial perivascular spaces of rats.
Article in Fluids and barriers of the CNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High frame ratebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The circulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through perivascular spaces (PVSs) has been proposed to play a role in clearing waste from the brain. While several studies have quantified such flow in mice, no in vivo studies with high spatial and temporal resolution have been performed on other species. Here, we imaged pial PVSs of rat brains and the CSF flows they carry, using techniques previously employed with mice. Using vessel pulsatility measurement and automated particle tracking, we quantified and analyzed in vivo CSF velocity profiles, artery wall motion, and PVS resistances in rats, comparing our findings to mice. Both species exhibit net CSF flows in the same direction as blood flow, and CSF pulsations are substantially synchronized with the heartbeat. We found that rats have larger, lower-resistance PVSs, resulting in much larger CSF volume flow rates in rats than in mice. We also found that the choice of anesthetic can significantly affect vasomotion and corresponding CSF pulsations in rats, with ketamine-dexmedetomidine producing a more stable response than ketamine-xylazine. Our results can be used in models of flow through rat PVSs, and as experiments are performed on additional species, can aid in projecting results across scales from animal models to human CSF flows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.