ArticleVeterinary research2026
Conjunctival administration of H38ΔwbkF rough vaccine as an effective strategy to protect against Brucella ovis infection while minimizing serological interference.
Article in Veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sheep brucellosis is a reproductive disease caused by Brucella melitensis and B. ovis, Gram-negative bacteria that differ in surface antigens: B. melitensis carries a smooth (S) lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with a characteristic O-polysaccharide (O-PS), while B. ovis bears a rough (R) LPS lacking O-PS. Only the former is zoonotic and of public health concern, but both cause significant economic losses, thus requiring effective vaccines. The sole vaccine available, B. melitensis Rev1, protects against both infections but induces antibodies detected by S-LPS-based tests used for B. melitensis surveillance. Since controlling this zoonotic species is a priority, Rev1 is banned in B. melitensis-free areas. Consequently, B. ovis (detected by R-LPS-based tests) remains endemic or re-emerges, and an R brucellosis vaccine is needed. Previously, we demonstrated that subcutaneous vaccination with B. melitensis R mutant H38ΔwbkF protects rams against B. ovis similarly to Rev1, without interfering in the official S-LPS-based Rose Bengal and Complement Fixation tests. However, H38ΔwbkF elicits R-LPS antibodies that interfere with B. ovis tests. Here, we explored two strategies to minimize this interference: (i) altering H38ΔwbkF relevant diagnostic epitopes by constructing wadB and wadC mutants deleted in sugars of the R-LPS core tetrasaccharide branch; and (ii) administering H38ΔwbkF conjunctivally, a route known to reduce antibody responses to S brucellosis vaccines. While the core-defective mutants were over-attenuated and failed to protect mice, the conjunctival route preserved H38ΔwbkF efficacy in rams and significantly reduced serological interference. Conjunctival H38ΔwbkF vaccine is thus a suitable tool for B. ovis eradication in B. melitensis-free areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.