ArticleBMC oral health2026
A web-based augmented reality system for orthodontic biomechanics: perceived usability and acceptability among dental students.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immersive Virtual Reality for Patient Education in Orthodontics: Cross-Sectional Feasibility and Acceptability Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe orthodontic biomechanics of tooth movement form the foundation of orthodontics and is essential for successful treatment outcomes. However, the traditional teaching method faces challenges, such as the complexity of concepts and difficulties in explaining three-dimensional (3D) tooth movement. To address these challenges, a web-based augmented reality (AR) system for orthodontic biomechanics (WAR Orthobiomechanics) was developed as a blended learning tool.
aimsTo evaluate the user satisfaction and behavioural intention of the WAR Orthobiomechanics system. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 56 undergraduate dental students from Years 3 to 5 at three institutions in Malaysia participated in this study. The System Usability Scale (SUS) and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) were employed to assess participants’ perceived usability and acceptability. Data were collected between July and August 2023 and analysed using descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA analysis, and Pearson correlation analyses.
resultsBoth SUS and TAM indicated positive user experiences. The overall SUS score was 68.97 ± 12.87 (moderate to good). The TAM showed satisfactory acceptability with a mean score of 76.92 ± 13.22. Pearson correlation analyses showed a moderate positive association between SUS and the overall TAM score (r = 0.493, p < 0.01), indicating concurrent validity between perceived usability and technology acceptance.
conclusionThe web-based AR system demonstrated acceptable usability and positive student acceptability in supporting the learning of orthodontic biomechanics. The evaluation results indicate that the system is feasible as a supplementary instructional tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.