ArticleBMC nursing2026
Burnout among Pakistani nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBurnout among nurses is a psychological syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment, typically arising from chronic workplace stress. Given the nursing shortage, high workload, and structural constraints within Pakistan’s healthcare system, an accurate estimate of burnout prevalence in this workforce is essential. This study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of burnout and explore sources of heterogeneity among Pakistani nurses.
methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251251405) and conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, APA PsycINFO, Google Scholar, and Pakistan-specific sources up to 21 October 2025. Quantitative observational studies reporting burnout prevalence using validated instruments (primarily the Maslach Burnout Inventory [MBI], Oldenburg Burnout Inventory [OLBI], Copenhagen Burnout Inventory [CBI], and Professional Quality of Life scale [ProQOL]) were eligible. Study quality was appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklist for prevalence studies. Meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model (REML) in STATA 17, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² statistic.
resultsTwenty-three studies were included in the systematic review, and 17 studies (n = 3164 nurses) met criteria for quantitative synthesis. The pooled prevalence of occupational burnout among Pakistani nurses was 68%. Heterogeneity was extremely high. Leave-one-out sensitivity analysis demonstrated the stability of the pooled estimate. Meta-regression showed no significant association between publication year and burnout prevalence (p=0.896). Subgroup analyses by measurement tool and geographic region revealed no significant between-group differences. Egger’s test indicated publication bias; however, the Trim-and-Fill method did not change the pooled estimate.
conclusionBurnout is highly prevalent among nurses in Pakistan. This high prevalence may reflect underlying structural challenges such as workforce shortages, heavy workloads, and limited organizational support. System-level reforms are urgently needed to improve working conditions and strengthen nurse retention policies. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.