ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026
Experimental quantification of balance using whole-body stability regions from postural sway exercises.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundComprehensive balance assessment is essential for evaluating balance deficiencies, particularly in individuals with limited mobility and increased fall risk. However, clinical balance assessments often rely on subjective scoring and simplified models that may not capture the full dynamics of human postural control. Additionally, center of pressure (COP)-based metrics and inverted pendulum models offer limited insight into whole-body balance ability. Balance regions (BRs) offer a more holistic approach by quantifying balanced center of mass (COM) states. Previously, BRs were used to assess the balancing capabilities of bipedal systems and humans in simulation; however, there is a lack of real-world implementations of whole-body BR analyses in human balance.
methodsThis study presents a novel experimental framework to quantify human balance using COM-based BRs derived from large postural sway tasks. The participants comprised 22 healthy young adults who performed voluntary, supported, and perturbed anterior-posterior (AP) sway exercises while standing on force plates, with a full-body motion capture setup. COM trajectories were obtained from individualized musculoskeletal models in OpenSim to construct BRs, which were compared with linear inverted pendulum (LIP) limits. Key COM-based metrics included maximum AP margin of stability (MoS), maximum AP velocity, extrapolated COM (XcoM) range, and BR areas. COP measures (root mean square (RMS), range, 95% confidence ellipse area, mean AP velocity) and joint kinematics were also analyzed.
resultsCOM trajectories largely stayed within the LIP-based analytical boundaries, with BRs capturing individualized balance envelopes. Significant sex differences were observed in the maximum posterior MoS (p = 0.01974), XcoM range metrics (p < 0.03924), and BR areas (p < 0.045). COP metrics varied significantly across tasks in the RMS, 95% confidence ellipse area, and mean velocity (p < 0.02046), and inverse kinematics revealed distinct joint coordination patterns during sway; there was a significant sex difference in the COP range during perturbed backward sway (p = 0.03053).
conclusionsThis study presents a novel, COM-based experimental framework for balance assessment that captures whole-body stability regions from dynamic postural tasks. BRs provide a quantitative and individualized measure of balance capacity beyond traditional metrics. This framework has potential for fall risk evaluation, balance training, and integration with wearable or markerless motion capture in clinical and neurorehabilitation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.