ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
Evaluation of static and dynamic pupil responses in patients with acromegaly with automatic pupillometer.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcromegaly is a chronic disorder caused by excessive secretion of growth hormone and IGF-I, usually from a benign pituitary adenoma, leading to systemic complications and increased mortality. Abnormal pupillary responses may indicate neurological or ophthalmic dysfunction. This study investigates pupillary response alterations in acromegaly patients using automatic pupillometry.
methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study involved 50 individuals diagnosed with acromegaly and an equal number of age- and sex-matched healthy controls. All subjects underwent a complete ophthalmological examination. Pupillary measurements were obtained static conditions (scotopic, mesopic and low-high photopic) and dynamic (rest pupil diameter, contraction amplitude, latency, contraction duration, contraction velocity, dilation latency, resting duration and velocity) using an automatic pupillometer.
resultsThe mean age of the patients with acromegaly was similar to that of the healthy control group (44.80 ± 4.46 and 42.52 ± 4.40 years, p = 0.85). According to the results of our study, mesopic and low- and high-photopic pupil diameter (PD) were significantly lower in patients with acromegaly (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In addition, when the dynamic pupillometry parameters of these patients were examined, it was found that the resting diameter, contraction amplitude, duration, and velocity (p < 0.001, all values), and dilatation latency and velocity were significantly lower (p < 0.001, both values), while only the latency of pupil contraction was higher (p = 0.02).The mean age of patients with acromegaly was comparable to that of the healthy control group (44.80 ± 4.46 vs. 42.52 ± 4.40 years, p = 0.85). Analysis revealed that pupil PD under mesopic, low photopic, and high photopic conditions were significantly reduced in the acromegaly cohort (p = 0.003, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, evaluation of dynamic pupillometry parameters demonstrated that resting pupil diameter, contraction amplitude, contraction duration, and contraction velocity were all significantly decreased (p < 0.001 for each). Similarly, both dilatation latency and dilatation velocity were markedly diminished (p < 0.001 for both), whereas the latency of pupil contraction was significantly prolonged (p = 0.02).
conclusionsOur findings indicate that both static and dynamic pupillometry parameters are compromised in patients with acromegaly. Consequently, the use of an automatic pupillometry system in these patients may serve as a convenient, non-invasive screening method for assessing pupil function. Nonetheless, a more comprehensive understanding of these effects necessitates multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and longer durations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.