ArticleBMC psychiatry2026
Addressing the complexity of recovery beyond reductionist, diagnosis‑driven care: a realist evaluation of a family-centered, narrative-based child and adolescent psychiatry practice.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConventional approaches following the biomedical model focused narrowly on symptom reduction often overlook critical social and familial factors influencing youth mental health, perpetuating stigma and long‑term dependence on care. As an example of a unique and innovative family-centered, narrative based approach in child and adolescent psychiatry in the Netherlands, this study examines “Het Huis”, to understand what aspects of its systemic, recovery‑oriented approach support meaningful recovery, for whom, and under what conditions.
methodsWe conducted a theory‑driven realist evaluation. An initial program theory was developed from a document review and stakeholder interviews. It was then iteratively tested through observations of 27 therapy sessions, 24 practitioner reflection reports, and 41 semi‑structured interviews with children and their parents collected between September 2023 and August 2024. Data were coded thematically using Context-Mechanism-Outcome configurations and refined via peer deliberation and member checks.
resultsThe findings confirmed and extended the initial program theory, revealing a dynamic “recovery loop” sustained by five core mechanisms, including enhanced tolerance for therapeutic friction, collective understanding of distress, integration of behaviors into a shared family narrative, structured peer engagement, and reduction of anxiety and negative cognitions. These mechanisms fostered (1) an effectively collaborating therapeutic and family system, (2) a co‑constructed multidimensional narrative of distress, and (3) strengthened individual and familial recovery capital, which in turn reinforced the therapeutic alliance and sustained the loop.
conclusionsThis study provides empirical support for a systemic, narrative‑based model of child and adolescent psychiatry that moves beyond reductionist, diagnosis‑driven care. By illustrating potential key mechanisms and contextual enablers, the refined program theory offers a blueprint for designing and implementing family‑focused, recovery‑oriented services in diverse settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.