ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Nutrient resorption rather than root acquisition offsets increased N limitation induced by the stand development of a secondary Pinus tabuliformis forest in North China.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Plants allocate nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) to green leaves through a cost-optimal trade-off between root acquisition and leaf resorption, which affects plant nutrient limitation and cycling. However, our understanding of the nature of this positive trade-off under nutrient limitation in forests with stand development under N deposition is limited. We carried out experiments along age sequences of 42, 55, and 65 in a P. tabuliformis forest under five N treatment levels (0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 g N m− 2·yr− 1). We multiplied a multivariate functional variable, INPS (the integral N: P stoichiometry of plants), which reflects the overall nutrient limitation in plants, to explore its response strategies under N treatment during stand development. We found that the P. tabuliformis forest experienced progressive N limitation with stand development under N deposition, as evidenced by the decreased N: P ratios across needles, twigs, and fine roots, and the whole plant (INPS). Thus, to cope with this progressive N limitation and maintain stoichiometric homeostasis, P. tabuliformis forest adopted divergent nutrient utilization strategies for N and P. Regarding the N, the NRE-N (nutrient resorption efficiency of N) did not decrease significantly as a coordinated response to the declining NAC-N (nutrient acquisition capacity of N) along the chronosequence. Conversely, for P, the relative P limitation weakened relative to N along the age sequence in P. tabuliformis forest led to a compensatory trade-off between NRE-P (nutrient resorption efficiency of P) and NAC-P (nutrient acquisition capacity of P), consistent with nutrient-economy and adaptive strategies. N deposition generally alleviated N limitations in P. tabuliformis forest yet significantly decreased the NRE-N and NRE-P across all age classes. However, the ratio of NRE-N: NAC-N exhibited a substantial increase along the chronosequence and negatively linearly correlated with the INPS. These findings indicate that NRE-N acts as a compensatory mechanism to offset age-related progressive stand-level N limitation. Our results suggest that resorption relieves nutrient limitations, a strategy used broadly by woody plants, providing a comprehensive framework for understanding forest adaptation strategies in a changing environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.