Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41794051›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026

Stoichiometry-induced differential selection on codon optimization among ribosomal protein genes in bacterial species.

Xuhua Xia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Xuhua XiaDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Marie-Curie Private, Ottawa, ON K1N 9A7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3092-7566

Funding

Natural Science and Engineering Research Council RGPIN-2024-05641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While it is well established that highly expressed genes in bacteria exhibit stronger codon optimization than lowly expressed ones, whether codon-anticodon adaptation shows fine-scale differentiation among highly expressed genes themselves remains unexplored. Ribosomal proteins, which are expressed in stoichiometric amounts and often cotranscribed in polycistronic operons, provide an ideal system for testing such differential selection. Here, I demonstrate that in Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, and Vibrio natriegens, codon usage is more optimized in long ribosomal protein genes compared to short ones. This pattern persists even among genes within individual operons, such as S10, spc, and α operons. A ribosome in E. coli or B. subtilis needs four copies of L7/L12 (encoded by rplL) but only one copy each of the other ribosomal proteins. This high demand for L7/L12 leads to my prediction that the rplL gene should be translated more actively than its operonic partner, rplJ, encoding L10. This prediction is also strongly supported by empirical evidence from representative bacterial species. Actively translated mRNAs are protected from endonucleolytic cleavage and degradation. If rplL mRNA is more actively translated than rplJ mRNA, then rplL mRNA would be degraded less and become more abundant than rplJ mRNA, which is true. These results demonstrate that translation optimization reflects functional stoichiometry and protein length constraints. This is the first demonstration of natural selection operating predictably and precisely among ribosomal protein genes in the same operon, fine-tuning translational output to achieve efficient ribosomal assembly.

Indexed as

CodonCodon UsageRibosomal ProteinsSelection, GeneticBacillus subtilisBacterial ProteinsEscherichia coliEvolution, MolecularOperonProtein BiosynthesisVibrioBacterial ProteinsCodonRibosomal Proteinscodon optimizationdifferential selectionribosomal proteinsstoichiometry and selectiontranslation initiation and elongation

Identifiers

PMID41794051
PMCPMC13001810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.