Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41793935›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental child psychology2026

Written or drawn episodic future thinking cues improves delay discounting in children.

Katelyn A Carr, Leonard H Epstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental child psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katelyn A CarrDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA. Electronic address: kcarr@buffalo.edu.
Leonard H EpsteinDivision of Behavioral Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University at Buffalo, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214, USA.

Funding

Can reinforcing alternatives to food prevent weight gain in children?R01HD088131 · NICHD · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2016 to 2020
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD088131
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most people prefer immediate to delayed rewards, even when the immediate rewards are smaller, and children have stronger preferences for immediate rewards compared to delayed rewards. Thinking about vivid, positive future events, or episodic future thinking (EFT), increases the extent to which adolescents and adults choose larger delayed rewards over smaller immediate rewards (delay discounting, DD). While EFT has improved DD in adolescents, previous methodology used auditory or written cues, relying on verbal elaboration and reading of cues to improve DD. Research on autobiographical and episodic memory has shown improvements in retention when using self-drawn images. Images and visual cues are frequently used in studies with children and research is needed to study the use of visual EFT cues as a method to improve EFT effectiveness on DD in children. Research in adults showed that both written and drawn EFT cues improved DD compared to a written episodic recent cue control group. In this study 10-13-year-old children (n = 58) were randomized to an EFT-drawing, EFT-writing or an episodic recent thinking (ERT) control drawing group and completed a DD task and a delay of gratification task for real monetary rewards. We found that both EFT drawing and EFT writing improved DD and delay of gratification for real monetary rewards. This suggests EFT is effective at improving DD in multiple modalities.

Indexed as

CuesDelay DiscountingMemory, EpisodicThinkingWritingAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleRewardChildrenDelay discountingDrawingEpisodic future thinkingProspection

Identifiers

PMID41793935
PMCPMC13656301

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.