ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2026
Reimagining Phage Therapy for MDR Pathogens: From Biobanks to Health System Integration-A Review.
Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phage Therapy Beyond Static Pharmaceuticals: A Framework for Controlled Evolutionary Platforms.Viruses · 2026Review
- Application of bacteriophages in the prevention and control of bacterial infectious diseases in animals.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens, exemplified by Klebsiella pneumoniae, pose a critical and escalating threat in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where limited diagnostic and therapeutic options exacerbate mortality. Bacteriophage (phage) therapy has re-emerged as a promising alternative, offering high specificity, biofilm disruption, and potential for low-cost production. However, a significant translational gap persists; while in vitro studies and results personalized phage therapy demonstrate efficacy, the pathway to clinical integration, especially in LMICs, remains obstructed by systemic barriers including the lack of local phage banks and undefined regulatory pathways. This review moves beyond a summary of biological promise to propose a novel, structured framework for implementation tailored to resource-limited health systems. We synthesize current evidence to introduce the 5-P roadmap, a cohesive strategy encompassing the establishment of integrated phage-host biobanks; development of context-appropriate preparations; rigorous preclinical validation emphasizing phage-antibiotic synergy; the parallel development of policy and regulatory pathways; and pilot clinical trials designed for subsequent health system integration. By addressing these interconnected pillars simultaneously, this framework provides an actionable blueprint to advance phage therapy from a laboratory concept to a scalable, equitable, and sustainable adjunct within national antimicrobial resistance strategies in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.