Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41793502›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026

Hormonal management after risk-reducing surgery in BRCA-mutated triple-negative breast cancer survivors.

Inna Jörg, Dimitrios Chronas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Inna JörgSpital Zollikerberg, Zollikerberg, Switzerland. inna.joerg@spitalzollikerberg.ch.
Dimitrios ChronasSpital Zollikerberg, Zollikerberg, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premenopausal women carrying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation are frequently advised to undergo risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) to lower their significantly increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. However, this procedure induces abrupt estrogen deprivation, resulting in premature menopause with well-documented consequences including vasomotor symptoms (e.g., hot flashes, night sweats), urogenital atrophy, and long-term risks such as osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, and cognitive decline (Nelson in Lancet 371(9614):760-770, 2008; Shuster et al. in Maturitas 65(2):161-166, 2010). To alleviate symptoms and prevent sequelae, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) remains the most effective intervention. However, the issue becomes complex when the patient has a personal history of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Although TNBC lacks hormone receptor expression, systemic HRT has traditionally been contraindicated in breast cancer survivors, as early studies indicated an increased risk of recurrence with hormone therapy, even in receptor-negative subtypes (Kenemans et al. Lancet Oncol 10(2):135-146, 2009a). This leads to a critical question: Is HRT appropriate in BRCA mutation carriers with a history of TNBC following BSO, and if so, under what clinical conditions? What do current international guidelines, evidence, and expert recommendations suggest?

Indexed as

BRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinHormone Replacement TherapyTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsFemaleGenes, BRCA1HumansMutationOvarian NeoplasmsSalpingo-oophorectomySurvivorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanAdnexectomyBRCA mutationHarmone replacement theraphy

Identifiers

PMID41793502
PMCPMC12967752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.