ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Bridging Gaps: Insights from a Rectal Buttonhole Tear Case Series.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisObstetric rectal buttonhole tears (ORBT) are isolated rectal mucosal lacerations with intact anal sphincters. These injuries are frequently overlooked during delivery, resulting in delayed diagnosis, rectovaginal fistula formation, and the need for surgical referral.
methodsA descriptive case series was conducted on seven women referred for ORBT repair between X across Y under Z (60,000 deliveries). All patients had intact anal sphincters with confirmed rectal mucosal tears identified at the time of delivery through systematic digital rectal examination and subsequently referred for repair within 24 h of injury. Repairs were performed using a standardized three-layer closure technique by a urogynaecologist within 7 h (median 2 h) of injury. Postoperative outcomes were assessed at 3 months with physical examination and St. Mark's incontinence score. An educational video demonstrating the repair was produced for obstetric practitioner training.
resultsSeven cases of ORBT were identified, with an incidence of 1 in 8571 deliveries (0.012%). All repairs were successful, with no rectovaginal fistula formation or complications. At 3 months, all women demonstrated complete continence (St. Mark's score 0/24).
conclusionsThis series emphasizes the importance of early recognition and structured management of ORBT. A standardized repair technique ensures excellent outcomes and, when combined with video-based training, can equip obstetric practitioners to manage these injuries promptly and reduce the need for surgical referral.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41793488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.