ReviewEuropean journal of haematology2026
Management of Primary Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Patients Unsuitable for CAR T-Cell Therapy.
Review in European journal of haematology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Minimal residual disease in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after first-line therapy: Defining the continuum from metabolic remission to molecular clearance.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Integrating Flow Cytometry in the Diagnostic Work of HIV-Associated Hodgkin's Lymphomas.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Interim efficacy and preliminary survival outcomes of polatuzumab vedotin in combination for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective real-world study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma is associated with poor outcomes and limited responsiveness to conventional salvage therapies. Although CAR T-cell therapy represents the standard of care in this setting, a substantial proportion of patients cannot receive it despite meeting disease-related criteria. In this review, "unsuitable" refers to patients who are temporarily or functionally unable to undergo CAR T-cell therapy because of reversible clinical conditions, rapidly progressive disease requiring immediate cytoreduction, or logistical and social barriers, rather than permanent contraindications. For these patients, prompt alternative strategies are required. Conventional platinum-based or gemcitabine- and bendamustine-containing regimens retain a role for short-term disease control but offer limited durability. In contrast, novel antibody-based therapies, including polatuzumab-containing combinations, loncastuximab tesirine, and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide, have expanded treatment options with improved tolerability. Most notably, CD20 × CD3 bispecific antibodies represent a major therapeutic advance, providing off-the-shelf immune engagement with predominantly outpatient administration. From a practical perspective, early identification of reversible barriers to CAR T-cell therapy and timely use of bispecific antibodies or other antibody-based regimens are critical to achieve rapid disease control, preserve organ function, and, when feasible, restore eligibility for cellular therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.