ArticleMolecular ecology resources2026
Assessment of High Throughput Sequencing Quality of Host DNA Enriched From Faeces: A Case From Captive Tiger.
Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Faeces serve as a widely used non-invasive material in wildlife studies, from which host DNA can be enriched for high-throughput sequencing. However, the characteristics of faecal DNA sequencing, particularly the relationship between sequencing volume and genotyping accuracy or genomic coverage, have remained unclear. This knowledge gap makes it challenging to pre-estimate the required sequencing depth to ensure data quality while controlling costs. In this study, we used host-enriched faecal DNA obtained via peri-extraction enrichment by SDS (PEERS) to perform comparative analyses of whole-genome sequencing data from paired faecal and blood samples of 11 captive Amur tigers. We systematically evaluated how data volume affects genomic coverage and genotyping accuracy. Our results revealed that faecal sequencing reads cover the genome unevenly, which may compromise the reliability of underrepresented allele identification and subsequent genomic analyses. Specifically, genomic coverage and genotyping accuracy, including precision, error rate, recall and F1-score, improved with increasing sequencing depth in both blood and faecal DNA. For reliable genotyping (values > 0.95), a minimum average depth of 20× was required for blood-derived DNA, whereas faecal DNA needed up to 50× depth when the nuclear DNA enrichment efficiency (EE
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.