ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026
Nanomedicine Meets Immunotherapy: Advancing Adoptive Cell Therapy with Nanoparticles in the Treatment of Cancer with Sustainability Perspectives.
Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- One-pot graphitic encapsulation of FeNanoscale · 2026Article
- Nanomedicine in 2026: Illustrative Quantitative Analyses of EPR Heterogeneity, Clinical Trial Attrition, and Emerging Horizons for Active Nanotherapeutics.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Clinical Translation of Functional Magnetic Nanoparticles for Intracellular Hyperthermia and Cancer Immunotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immunotherapy has achieved remarkable clinical success in certain cancers, particularly through adoptive cell therapy (ACT), where T cell engineering with chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) has driven major clinical breakthroughs in the treatment of hematologic malignancies. However, efficacy against solid tumors remains limited due to multiple barriers, including the scarcity of tumor-specific antigens, antigen heterogeneity, immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, and physical obstruction of T cell infiltration by dense extracellular matrix. Nanoparticle (NP)-based approaches can overcome these obstacles and enhance ACT by improving tumor immunogenicity and vascular permeability, while reducing off-target toxicity to healthy tissues. This review discusses different strategies leveraging NPs to enhance ACT, including the delivery of immunomodulators and chemotherapeutics, NP-mediated hyperthermia, magnetic guidance to improve T cell accumulation in tumors, and in vivo NP-mediated generation and activation of CAR T cells. While prioritizing patient safety is essential, it does not fully reflect the range of risks and challenges associated with novel nanomedicines. In this regard, we discuss how integrating environmental impact assessments early in the development process is crucial for identifying key impact areas of concern and steering innovation towards more sustainable and responsible designs. Finally, we also identify current challenges, and discuss potential solutions and future research directions, including safety and sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.