ArticleEcology2026
Species-specific interactions with apex carnivores yield unique benefits and burdens for mesocarnivores.
Article in Ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Species-specific interactions with apex carnivores yield unique benefits and burdens for mesocarnivores.Ecology · 2026Article
- Density and Coexistence Patterns of an Apex Carnivore (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mesocarnivores navigate a complex risk-reward continuum in ecosystems shared with their apex counterparts, balancing scavenging opportunities with risks of mortality. However, the risks to mesocarnivores in multi-carnivore systems are not uniform; they can vary with specific apex-meso pairings. Using remote cameras and GPS-telemetry, we examined space-use, temporal activity, fine-scale interactions, and scavenging behaviors of mesocarnivores (red foxes and coyotes) in relation to apex carnivores (wolves and cougars) in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA. Coyote space use was positively linked to wolf presence, while red fox space use was positively linked to cougar presence. Notably, photo-detection rates of mesocarnivores doubled within 24 h of apex carnivore detections-except for coyotes following cougars. Coyotes were more frequent scavengers at wolf and cougar kills than red foxes, but this behavior came at a cost. Over 60% of wolf-caused coyote mortalities were linked to wolf kill sites, though wolves rarely consumed the coyotes themselves. In contrast, cougars hunted and consumed coyotes as prey, posing an additional risk of predation. We interpret our findings in light of different hunting strategies and habitat preferences of canid and felid apex carnivores, which create distinct risks for mesocarnivores and drive species-specific behaviors that can influence trophic dynamics in multi-carnivore systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.