ArticleScience progress
Impact of pulmonary-artery-to-aorta ratio on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: A retrospective study.
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectivePulmonary-to-aortic diameter ratio (P/A) correlates with pulmonary hypertension (PH), which is linked to adverse outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of the P/A ratio, measured using computed tomography (CT), on adverse postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).MethodsThis study included 387 patients with aortic valve disease who underwent TAVI between January 2018 and June 2024. The clinical endpoint was the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and postoperative hospitalization for heart failure. The cut-off value for the P/A ratio was obtained by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between the P/A ratio and the composite outcome, with subsequent subgroup and sensitivity analyses.ResultsThe median follow-up time was 19 months [interquartile range (IQR): 1.00-59.0], and a composite outcome occurred in 14% of patients in this study. A P/A ratio of 0.84 was identified as the optimal cut-off value. Compared with the low P/A group, the high P/A group had a higher proportion of females and patients with diabetes, higher triglyceride levels, and higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) levels. Multivariable Cox analysis confirmed that a high P/A ratio [hazard ratio (HR): 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-3.72; p = 0.04] was associated with the composite outcome. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results.ConclusionsThe P/A ratio measured using CT may serve as a novel prognostic factor in patients undergoing TAVI. A high P/A ratio (≥ 0.84) is an independent risk factor for the composite outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.