ReviewBrain : a journal of neurology2026
A computational framework for epigenetic plasticity in memory.
Review in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memories are thought to be encoded in synaptic connections between assemblies of neurons that are reactivated during memory recall. However, in light of ongoing molecular turnover and synaptic decay, this widely accepted view cannot explain how individual ensembles are maintained over (life-)long timescales. Experimentally, learning has not only been associated with synaptic modifications among neurons, but also with epigenetic alterations of learning-related gene transcription within neurons. Although these epigenetic changes are involved in all stages of memory dynamics, they have been largely omitted in computational studies. In this update, we advocate for the integration of epigenetic mechanisms into computational models of memory. Using a recurrent neural network model that includes epigenetic plasticity as a variable, we explore the role of epigenetic priming in the maintenance of memories across long timescales; we then investigate the implications of epigenetic modifications for memory allocation and for reversing cognitive decline associated with neurodegeneration; and finally, we predict several computational advantages of including epigenetics over traditional models of synaptic memory. Overall, this paper stands as a first step towards the integration of epigenetics in computational models of memory and corroborates the experimentally derived notion that memory might not be encoded solely in synaptic weights, but rather co-encoded in epigenetic patterns within the nucleus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.