Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41793113›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2026

The Evolutionary Flexibility of the Drosophila Circadian Clock: Network Constraints or Adaptive Freedom?

Leo Douglas Creasey, Petar Borisov Petrov, Eran Tauber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leo Douglas CreaseyDepartment of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0009-0004-5351-7684
Petar Borisov PetrovInfotech Institute, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-5551-8032
Eran TauberDepartment of Evolutionary and Environmental Biology, Institute of Evolution, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4018-6535

Funding

Marie Sklodowska-Curie ITN "CINCHRON' 765937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of network evolution is critical to understanding how complex biological processes arise and adapt over time. Protein networks, composed of interacting components, can exhibit varying degrees of conservation and flexibility, enabling organisms to fine-tune their responses to environmental changes. Using the circadian clock system in Drosophila as a case study, we explore how such networks evolve. We leverage the recently published 101 Drosophilidae genome project to analyze the evolution and co-evolution of 11 core clock proteins across 65 species spanning about 60 million years of evolution. A sliding window analysis of coding regions reveals substantial heterogeneity in nucleotide divergence, with Clk and per exhibiting high divergence, whereas Pdp1 and sgg show virtually no evolutionary change. Additionally, we assessed interdependent amino acid evolution across different proteins, identifying 67 co-evolving site pairs, primarily among CLK-PER, CLK-CWO, and SGG-PER. Using codon-based models of evolution, we found four genes (cwo, jet, per, and sgg) showing evidence of positive selection. Since several clock proteins are pleiotropic, we tested whether their multifunctionality influences their evolutionary constraints. Using alternative approaches to assess pleiotropy, we found no significant correlation between pleiotropy and the nonsynonymous substitution rate (Ka) in 440 Drosophila proteins, including circadian clock ones. Overall, our findings suggest that the circadian clock network does not impose strong constraints on the evolution of its components. This flexibility may facilitate species-specific adaptation of the clock and allow the pleiotropic functions of clock proteins.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularAnimalsCLOCK ProteinsSelection, GeneticCLOCK ProteinsDrosophila Proteinscircadian clocksDrosophila melanogastergene networksmolecular co-evolutionpleiotropyprotein networks

Identifiers

PMID41793113
PMCPMC13011797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.