ArticlePsychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society2026
Eligibility for Anti-Amyloid-β Monoclonal Antibodies in Patients With Primary Progressive Aphasia due to Alzheimer's Disease in Japan.
Article in Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a clinical syndrome characterized by progressive language impairment. The logopenic variant (lvPPA) is frequently associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. With the approval of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibodies, such as lecanemab and donanemab, for the treatment of AD, accurately differentiating lvPPA due to AD (lvAD) from the other PPA variants has become highly important.
methodsThirteen patients with PPA who underwent cognitive testing, including the Standard Language Test of Aphasia (SLTA), brain magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarker analysis, and amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) imaging were enrolled in this study. Patients were classified into the lvPPA, semantic variant PPA (svPPA), and nonfluent/agrammatic variant PPA (nfaPPA) groups based on the results of clinical and neuropsychological assessments. We determined the proportion of PPA patients in each group who met the optimal use guidelines for anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy.
resultsSix (86%) of the 7 lvPPA patients were amyloid positive (A+), and 5 (71%) were eligible for lecanemab or donanemab. In most lvPPA patients, SPECT displayed an AD-typical pattern of hypoperfusion in the bilateral temporoparietal regions, posterior cingulate gyrus, and precuneus. One lvPPA patient was negative for AD biomarkers and demonstrated an atypical perfusion pattern for AD, and was subsequently rediagnosed as having frontotemporal lobar degeneration.
conclusionsThese results suggest that SPECT may play a supportive role in differentiating lvAD from PPA. In the current clinical era of anti-amyloid-β monoclonal antibody therapy, accurate identification of lvAD among patients with language-predominant symptoms is increasingly important. Larger studies should be performed in the near future to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.