Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792954›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

Effectiveness of Scientific Literacy and Communication E-Modules in a Molecular Biology Course: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis.

Meghan Kates, Alexa Fitzpatrick, Yupeng Zhang, Alison Gibbs, Qin Liu, Alan da Silveira Fleck, Leora Freedman, Stavroula Andreopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Meghan KatesDepartment of Immunology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alexa FitzpatrickDepartment of Biochemistry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Yupeng ZhangInstitute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alison GibbsInstitute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0408-3435
Qin LiuInstitute for Studies in Transdisciplinary Engineering Education and Practice, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Alan da Silveira FleckCentre for Teaching Support & Innovation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leora FreedmanFaculty of Arts and Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Stavroula AndreopoulosDepartment of Biochemistry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2460-7555

Funding

Faculty of Arts & Science, ELL Initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In previous work, we described the development and implementation of new pedagogical practices aimed at enhancing literacy, critical thinking, and communication skills development in a third-year undergraduate molecular biology course. The online nature and large size of the course presented challenges regarding student engagement and access to adequate support. To address these issues, we created four assignments (Journal Article, TED-style Talk, Reflective, and Concept Map) to build scientific literacy skills. To develop the intended skills, we designed interactive e-learning modules with active learning opportunities and practice activities to provide effective feedback. Here, we present an evaluation of the outcomes of this work by comparing student engagement in the modules with learning outcomes and academic performance indicators. The majority of students indicated that the e-modules were conducive to their learning and acquisition of scientific literacy skills. Additionally, most students found that all individual e-modules and associated assignments supported their learning, with somewhat lower agreeance among students regarding the Journal Article assignment. This feedback and student performance on the assignment supported our hypothesis that students lack practice developing these skills earlier in their education. Overall, there was a trend showing that higher student engagement with the e-modules was associated with higher assignment scores and final grades. Therefore, the e-modules and assignments supported the goals of improving targeted skills and contributed to an overall positive learning environment for students. These data demonstrate the utility of online e-modules for student learning and the usefulness of learning analytics data to better understand the student experience.

Indexed as

CommunicationComputer-Assisted InstructionLiteracyMolecular BiologyProblem-Based LearningCurriculumEducational MeasurementHumansStudentsbiochemistrycommunicatione‐learningliteracyscience education

Identifiers

PMID41792954
PMCPMC13206462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.