ArticleJournal of clinical apheresis2026
Guidance for Documentation of Therapeutic Apheresis Interventions in the Medical Record: An American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Practice Perspective.
Article in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Apheresis Medicine as a Multidisciplinary Subspecialty: International Models for Training, Quality, and Professional Societies.Journal of clinical apheresis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In 2007, the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) published guidance for physician documentation related to oversight of therapeutic apheresis (TA). Due to 21st century changes in healthcare delivery, the ASFA Board of Directors (BOD) charged its Public Affairs and Advocacy Committee (PAAC) to coordinate a review and update of the guidance. PAAC members reviewed minutes from various ASFA committees' earlier deliberations and sought additional information from the medical and general literature and regulatory/professional organizations involved with medical records documentation as well as from ASFA membership. A draft document was developed, reviewed, and approved by pertinent parties with changes incorporated into the guidance revision. Major change agents impacting TA documentation were identified including the importance of multidisciplinary care teams, the adoption of telemedicine in TA delivery, and the challenges highlighted by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Formats involving TA documentation scenarios related to initial TA consultations and subsequent care activities by TA staff were developed. The introduction of new technologies, the advancing and mandating of electronic medical records (EMRs) adoption and a renewed emphasis on the team-based nature of healthcare delivery have all impacted TA services. Revised documentation formatting practices related to these changes, not only for physicians' involvement but recognition and inclusion of other members of multidisciplinary teams participating in TA, should be incorporated into TA operations. Such revisions can potentially enhance patient care and provide a foundation for TA-related biovigilance activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.