ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2026
Machine Learning Prediction of Laccase-Catalyzed Oxidation of Aromatic Compounds Using Curated Enzyme-Specific Datasets.
Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laccases are multi-copper oxidase enzymes that oxidize a wide range of aromatic and non-aromatic compounds using molecular oxygen, producing water as the sole byproduct and making them attractive biocatalysts for green chemistry. However, the ability of laccases to oxidize specific substrates depends on a complex interplay of molecular structure, enzyme properties, redox potential, and environmental context, making laccase-substrate compatibility hard to predict. We apply machine learning models to pre-screen laccase-substrate combinations, streamlining experimental workflows. We evaluate four classical classifiers and a transformer-based model (ChemBERTa) on three in-house curated datasets of aromatic substrates with oxidation profiles for distinct laccases. Overall, the tested models achieve comparable performance, with random forest (RFC) demonstrating more stability across different data splits and laccases. This assessment is complemented by RFC feature-importance and ChemBERTa attention analyses, which highlight molecular features associated with oxidation outcomes. We also introduce a lightweight tool to visualize ChemBERTa predictions by mapping SMILES attributions onto molecular graphs. These findings provide a robust, interpretable framework for accelerating laccase-substrate discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.