Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792883›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2026

Machine Learning Prediction of Laccase-Catalyzed Oxidation of Aromatic Compounds Using Curated Enzyme-Specific Datasets.

Yulia Kulagina, Christian Goldhahn, Ramon Weishaupt, Mark Schubert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yulia KulaginaWoodTec, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa), Dübendorf, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9066-7129
Christian GoldhahnWood Materials Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ramon WeishauptMedical Department, A. Vogel AG, Roggwil, Switzerland.
Mark SchubertWoodTec, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa), Dübendorf, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laccases are multi-copper oxidase enzymes that oxidize a wide range of aromatic and non-aromatic compounds using molecular oxygen, producing water as the sole byproduct and making them attractive biocatalysts for green chemistry. However, the ability of laccases to oxidize specific substrates depends on a complex interplay of molecular structure, enzyme properties, redox potential, and environmental context, making laccase-substrate compatibility hard to predict. We apply machine learning models to pre-screen laccase-substrate combinations, streamlining experimental workflows. We evaluate four classical classifiers and a transformer-based model (ChemBERTa) on three in-house curated datasets of aromatic substrates with oxidation profiles for distinct laccases. Overall, the tested models achieve comparable performance, with random forest (RFC) demonstrating more stability across different data splits and laccases. This assessment is complemented by RFC feature-importance and ChemBERTa attention analyses, which highlight molecular features associated with oxidation outcomes. We also introduce a lightweight tool to visualize ChemBERTa predictions by mapping SMILES attributions onto molecular graphs. These findings provide a robust, interpretable framework for accelerating laccase-substrate discovery.

Indexed as

Hydrocarbons, AromaticLaccaseMachine LearningBiocatalysisOxidation-ReductionPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsHydrocarbons, AromaticLaccasebiocatalysisChemBERTachemical reactivity predictionlaccasesmachine learningmolecular descriptorsSMILES

Identifiers

PMID41792883
PMCPMC12966443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.