ArticleBMC psychology2026
A fNIRS hyperscanning study on enhancing intimacy through emotional self-disclosure from the discloser-responder perspective.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During social interactions, individuals often share their emotions with friends to enhance mutual intimacy. According to the interpersonal process model of intimacy, emotional disclosure predicts the development of intimacy, and a partner' s responsive behavior can further facilitate this process. However, how emotional self-disclosure and a partner' s response jointly influence intimacy and the underlying neural mechanisms in naturalistic conversations remain unclear. This study employed functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) hyperscanning to investigate the brain mechanisms underlying the enhancement of intimacy in female dyads during emotional conversations, which included conditions of positive and negative emotional self-disclosure as well as non-self-disclosure. Behavioral results revealed that dyads in the self-disclosure condition reported higher levels of intimacy, and both state-level cognitive and state-level affective empathy were positively correlated with intimacy. At the neural level, the responder's left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) showed significant activation differences. Specifically, responder's brains exhibited greater activation during positive (vs. negative) emotional sharing and during self-disclosure (vs. non-self-disclosure) conditions. Furthermore, in positive emotional contexts, self-disclosure elicited stronger neural activation in responder's compared to non-self-disclosure; however, no significant difference was observed in negative emotional contexts. Importantly, this neural activation mediated the path through which state-level empathy influenced intimacy. These findings highlight the responder's neural reactivity as a crucial factor in transforming empathic resonance into intimacy during emotional communication, underscoring the importance of partner feedback in forging deeper emotional bonds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.