Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792841›Full record

ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2026

Biomechanical evaluation of individual 3D-printed vertebrae.

Florian Metzner, Stefan Schleifenbaum, Christoph-Eckhard Heyde, Nicolas Heinz von der Höh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Florian MetznerZESBO - Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany. florian.metzner@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Stefan SchleifenbaumZESBO - Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph-Eckhard HeydeZESBO - Center for Research on Musculoskeletal Systems, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Semmelweisstraße 14, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Nicolas Heinz von der HöhDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Traumatology and Plastic Surgery, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized 3D-printed bone models are becoming increasingly popular in clinical care. Common applications include the visualization of idiopathic deformities or complex joint fractures. Functionalizing such printed replicas in terms of individual mechanical properties holds great potential for clinical training and research but is challenging due to the complexity of the bone structure. This study aims at developing a parametrizable structure as a substitute for spongious bone by simplifying 3D reconstruction and printing.

methods43 vertebrae from 6 body donors aged 86.8 ± 7.8 years were examined. Each spine underwent a clinical computed tomography scan. Cylindrical samples (Ø6 × 12 mm) were randomly taken from the left or right side of the vertebral body using a core drill in the superior-inferior direction. Specific software was used for determining the volumetric Hounsfield units of the spongious bone in each vertebral hemisphere. In parallel, a parametric hexagonal grid structure was designed using engineering software. All rods within the lattice have a variable length L and a fixed diameter of t = 0.4 mm. By varying the ratio t/L, six different porosities were defined. For each of these, five cylindrical lattice samples (diameter/length = 1/2) from two different synthetic resins were manufactured using the stereolithography printing process. All samples were mechanically characterized by uniaxial compressive testing. Curve fitting based on power functions (y = axb) allowed the determination of correlations between mechanical parameters and Hounsfield units (bone) as well as the lattice parameter t/L (3D-printed lattice). Finally, three vertebrae with varying bone quality were printed with their respected parameterized lattice and evaluated by comparing the axial screw pullout forces of the human and the respective printed bones.

resultsThere is a significant correlation between the mechanical properties of the bone specimens and the determined Hounsfield units. Furthermore, the mechanical properties of the lattice can be excellently described by the ratio t/L. The printed vertebrae showed pull-out forces similar to those of osteoporotic bone. CONLUSION: The mechanical behavior of vertebral human spongious bone can be well reproduced by a 3D-printed generic lattice structure. Patient-specific bone models can be generated by integrating the parameterizable lattice structure into the specific bone contours. These models can help in improving patient care, for instance by enabling highly realistic surgical approaches for particularly complex anatomies.

Indexed as

3D-printingAdditive manufacturingBoneBone densityCancellous boneCompressive testLatticeOsteoporosisStereolithography

Identifiers

PMID41792841
PMCPMC13063776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.