ReviewJournal of medical case reports2026
Effective high-dose methotrexate toxicity reversal using fixed-dose glucarpidase in obese patients: a case series.
Review in Journal of medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis case report and literature review present two instances of delayed methotrexate clearance in individuals who were successfully managed using fixed dosing versus weight-based dosing of glucarpidase. These cases, along with existing literature, support the use of fixed-dose glucarpidase as an alternative to weight-based dosing for delayed methotrexate clearance. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient 1: a 26-year-old obese African American male with newly diagnosed osteosarcoma of the right distal fibula underwent his first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with MAP. Following the administration of doxorubicin and cisplatin, the patient developed acute kidney injury, with increased serum creatinine. He was admitted for high-dose methotrexate administration. Leucovorin rescue began 24 hours after high-dose methotrexate infusion. Twenty-five hours post-infusion, the patient had an elevated serum creatinine and methotrexate levels. A fixed dose of glucarpidase (2000 units) was administered, resulting in rapidly declining methotrexate levels and patient discharge. Patient 2: a 77-year-old obese white male with primary central nervous system lymphoma was admitted for cycle 3 of high-dose methotrexate and rituximab as first-line treatment. His pretreatment comorbidities included chronic kidney disease, coronary artery disease, hypertension, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Following rituximab and high-dose methotrexate administration, nephrology was consulted owing to elevated creatinine. Leucovorin rescue began 24 hours after high-dose methotrexate treatment. On day 2, creatinine remained elevated with a post-dose methotrexate level indicating potential delayed clearance. A fixed dose of glucarpidase (2000 units) was administered, resulting in rapidly declining methotrexate levels and patient discharge. Cycle 4 was performed without complications, but cycle 5 required a fixed dose of glucarpidase owing to potential delayed clearance, resulting in rapidly declining methotrexate levels and patient discharge.
conclusionIn patients receiving high-dose methotrexate therapy requiring glucarpidase therapy, transitioning to a fixed dosing approach has significant cost-saving implications for institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.