Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41792828›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Post elimination of lymphatic filariasis: a situation analysis of brugian filariasis and vector potentialities within the filarial transmission belt in Sri Lanka.

Sachini U Nimalrathna, Hiruni Harischandra, Nilmini Chandrasena, Michael J Kimber, Nilanthi de Silva, Chandana H Mallawarachchi, Thilina S Nimalrathna, B G D Nissanka K de Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sachini U NimalrathnaCenter for Biotechnology, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Hiruni HarischandraGenetics and Molecular Biology Unit, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka.
Nilmini ChandrasenaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
Michael J KimberDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
Nilanthi de SilvaDepartment of Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Kelaniya, Kelaniya, Sri Lanka.
Chandana H MallawarachchiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, China.
Thilina S NimalrathnaSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Hong Kong SAR, Hong Kong, China.
B G D Nissanka K de SilvaCenter for Biotechnology, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Applied Sciences, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda, Sri Lanka. nissanka@sci.sjp.ac.lk.

Funding

National Research Council, Sri Lanka 19-028University of Sri Jayewardenepura ASP/01/RE/SCI/2022/31
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSri Lanka is experiencing a re-emergence of brugian filariasis 4 decades after its elimination in 1969. A comprehensive understanding of the mosquito species that can facilitate the development of the brugian parasite is essential for implementing targeted surveillance and control measures. This study evaluated the vector potentiality of field-caught mosquitoes for brugian parasites across endemic districts within the filarial transmission belt in Sri Lanka.

methodsMosquito surveillance was conducted at six sites across five districts with the highest reported brugian cases during 2021-2022. Mosquitoes were collected at the site of the most recently reported human brugian case in each district using dog-baited, window and gravid traps to maximize species diversity and abundance in the sample. Mosquitoes were identified morphologically, and randomly selected mosquitoes were molecularly confirmed via a PCR targeting the COΙ region. Vector potentiality was evaluated by observing nematode parasites upon dissection, molecular confirmation via PCR and sequencing the Brugia sp.-specific HhaΙ region. Mosquitoes harboring the infective L3 stage brugian parasites were tested for the presence of human DNA to investigate their involvement in human brugian filariasis transmission. Statistical analyses were performed using generalized linear mixed models.

resultsA total of 766 mosquitoes of 15 species were dissected to obtain L3 larvae of the brugian parasite. Of these, 10.05% (n = 77) from nine species across four genera were identified to support the development of Brugia spp. to the infective L3 larval stage within the head and thoraces of field-caught mosquitoes: Mansonia annulifera, Ma. indiana, Ma. uniformis, Culex lophoceraomyia, Cx. tritaeniorhynchus, Cx. quinquefasciatus, Cx. vishnui, Armigeres subalbatus and Coquillettidia crassipes. Notably, Ma. indiana, which has not previously been identified as a potential vector for brugian filariasis in Sri Lanka, showed the highest weighted infectivity at the S

conclusionsMany mosquito genera supporting the development of Brugia spp. to the infective L3 larval stage in field-caught mosquitoes were identified expanding beyond the previously known Mansonia vectors. The diversity of potentially infective species indicates complex transmission dynamics requiring integrated surveillance approaches.

Indexed as

BrugiaCulicidaeElephantiasis, FilarialMosquito VectorsAnimalsCulexDisease EradicationDogsFemaleHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSri LankaBrugia malayiBrugian filariasis vectorsMosquito surveillancePost-eliminationSri Lanka

Identifiers

PMID41792828
PMCPMC12973600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.