ArticleCritical care (London, England)2026
Etiology-specific prognostic value of ultra-early diffusion-weighted MRI after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Why Post-Cardiac Arrest Interventions Often Fail: Therapeutic Amenability and the Rapidly Closing Window of Neuroprotection.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) within 0–6 h after return of spontaneous circulation can detect hypoxic-ischemic brain injury following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Whether ultra-early findings differ by arrest etiology and how they should guide prognostication remains uncertain.
methodsWe conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of OHCA survivors who underwent ultra-early DW-MRI (0–6 h); a subset had follow-up scans (72–96 h). Etiology was classified as cardiac or respiratory. We assessed the prognostic performance of qualitative ultra-early high-signal-intensity (HSI) and quantitative ADC-R(650) (% brain voxels with ADC ≤ 650 × 10⁻⁶ mm²/s) using receiver operating characteristic analysis to estimate the area under the curve (AUC) and sensitivity at 100% specificity. Qualitative HSI was based on routine clinical readings, with readers blinded to clinical outcomes and other clinical information. The primary outcome was poor neurological outcome at 6 months (CPC 3–5).
resultsAmong 176 patients (77 cardiac, 99 respiratory), 94 (53.4%) had poor outcomes. Ultra-early HSI occurred exclusively in patients with poor outcomes, yielding 100% specificity in both etiologies. At 100% specificity, sensitivity was significantly lower for respiratory etiology (52% vs. 86%; P = 0.006). Ultra-early HSI predicted poor outcome (AUC 0.80), with higher discrimination in the cardiac etiology subgroup (0.93 vs. 0.76; P < 0.001). In contrast, ultra-early ADC-R(650) showed modest prognostic value (AUC 0.77), but with similar discrimination between cardiac and respiratory etiology subgroups (0.80 vs. 0.77; P = 0.71). In the follow-up subset (n = 150), HSI demonstrated high discrimination for poor outcome (AUC 0.93) with no difference in AUC between cardiac and respiratory etiologies (0.96 vs. 0.95; P = 0.57). At this later time point, ADC-R(650) demonstrated high prognostic performance (AUC 0.91), with comparable results across etiologies (0.89 vs. 0.93; P = 0.47).
conclusionsHSI on ultra-early DW-MRI is specific for poor outcome after OHCA, but sensitivity is lower in respiratory etiology. DW-MRI at 72–96 h provides prognostic performance independent of etiology. Following OHCA, ultra-early HSI may help phenotype patients, particularly those with cardiac etiology, supporting an etiology-aware staged approach to DW-MRI–based prognostication. Further validation is warranted to explain delayed diffusion restriction in respiratory etiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.