ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2026
A novel anterior occipitocervical fixation instrument improves stability and minimizes bone-implant stress: a comparative finite element analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose Posterior fixation is commonly the preferred surgical method for occipitocervical instability. In certain cases, posterior surgery no longer holds an advantage, and it is more advisable to choose the anterior approach. Furthermore, some internal fixation failures are stress-related. Therefore, we designed three types of anterior fixation instruments and evaluated them via finite element analysis, aiming to identify a design that enhances stability while minimizing stress at the bone-implant interface.Methods We performed a finite element analysis using a validated C0-C2 model with simulated instability. Three distinct instruments were virtually implanted: Occipital Condylar Plate (OCP); Atlanto-Occipital Transarticular Plate (AOP); and Atlantoaxial-Occipital Plate (AAOP). We applied a 40-N axial load and 1.5-Nm moments to simulate flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Segmental range of motion (ROM) and von Mises stress at the implant and bone were analyzed.Results All three instruments increased stability. However, the OCP design was markedly superior, reducing flexion ROM by 50-61.54% compared to the AOP and AAOP, respectively. Most critically, the OCP demonstrated the lowest von Mises stress at the bone across all motion states. Its stress distribution was also the most uniform, in stark contrast to the high stress concentrations observed with the other designs.Conclusions Among the three instruments, the OCP provides the most robust stability and, crucially, the most favorable stress environment, which may reduce the clinical risk of stress-related internal fixation failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.