ArticleBMC psychology2026
A qualitative study of physical education teachers' perceptions of artificial intelligence and influencing factors based on social cognitive theory.
Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Exploring university physical education teachers' artificial intelligence use intention profiles: a Q-methodology study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the application of artificial intelligence in physical education, how physical education teachers understand and embrace AI technology in their actual teaching has become a key issue in the reform of physical education. However, existing research has paid insufficient attention to physical education teachers’ cognitive states and their influencing factors, making it difficult to provide a basis for effectively integrating AI technology into physical education classrooms. This study aims to reveal physical education teachers’ perceptions of AI and clarify the core factors influencing their acceptance of AI technology. Based on Social Cognitive Theory, the research primarily sets three objectives: First, to analyse physical education teachers’ basic perceptions and attitudes toward AI; second, to examine the personal, environmental, and behavioural factors affecting their acceptance of AI technology; and third, to construct a model of the mechanism underlying physical education teachers’ acceptance of AI technology. This study employed qualitative research methods, utilising purposive sampling to conduct semi-structured interviews with 16 physical education teachers. Data coding and thematic analysis were performed using NVivo software. Findings revealed that a combination of multidimensional factors, including personal, environmental, situational, and resource factors, influences physical education teachers’ acceptance of AI. Among these, self-efficacy serves as the core factor driving physical education teachers’ acceptance of AI. Outcome expectancy significantly influences behavioural decisions, while subjective norms mediate the relationship between self-efficacy and these decisions. By integrating SCT with SDT, this study provides a more context-sensitive explanation of PE teachers’ AI acceptance in embodied teaching settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.