ReviewWorld journal of surgical oncology2026
Macrophage-centered immunotherapy for osteosarcoma: mechanisms, repolarization, and translational strategies.
Review in World journal of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone niche-driven antitumor immune failure in osteosarcoma: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Nutritional biomarkers regulating tumor immune microenvironment in osteosarcoma and as predictors of immune checkpoint inhibitor responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite multimodal treatment strategies, survival rates for osteosarcoma have remained stagnant, and immune checkpoint blockade targeting PD-1/PD-L1 alone has demonstrated limited clinical benefit. Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), which are abundant in osteosarcoma and predominantly exhibit an M2-like polarization, contribute significantly to immunosuppression, angiogenesis, metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance. This review outlines the origins and polarization dynamics of TAMs, and highlights central mechanisms through which they impair T-cell function (e.g., PD-1/PD-L1, TIM-3/galectin-9), inhibit phagocytosis (CD47/SIRPα), facilitate metastatic spread (CCL18–Wnt/β-catenin, COX-2/STAT3), and promote therapy resistance (IL-1β, extracellular vesicles). Emerging therapeutic strategies include depleting TAMs or inhibiting their recruitment (via CCL2/CCR2 or CSF1R blockade), disrupting checkpoint signals (anti-CD47/SIRPα, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors), and reprogramming M2 TAMs toward an M1 phenotype using pharmacological agents, nanotherapeutics, physical modalities (e.g., R848, photothermal therapy), and metabolic signaling inhibitors (PI3Kγ, ERK5). Innovative approaches such as CAR-macrophages and combined immune–vascular targeting may further amplify antitumor responses. Key challenges, including non-standardized markers, methodological variability, and spatiotemporal heterogeneity, underscore the need for a TAM-reprogramming paradigm over mere depletion, and support the integration of multi-omic spatial profiling and biomarker-driven clinical trials focused on metastatic disease. Ultimately, macrophage-targeted therapies integrated with conventional treatments hold promise for improving outcomes in osteosarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.