ArticleBMC oral health2026
Masticatory muscle stiffness in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate sleep bruxism (SB) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by assessing the thickness and stiffness of the masseter and temporalis muscles using ultrasonography and shear wave elastography (SWE).
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 68 patients diagnosed with OSA. The presence of SB was assessed using clinical criteria. Demographic and clinical variables—including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), apnea–hypopnea index (AHI), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and maximum mouth opening—were recorded. Bilateral ultrasonography and SWE measurements of the masseter and temporalis muscles were performed at rest and during clenching. Comparisons were made between bruxist and non-bruxist patients, as well as between those with mild–moderate and severe OSA. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v30.0. Independent-samples t-tests and chi-square tests were applied; p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.
resultsSB was observed in 51.5% of patients with OSA. Compared to those without SB, patients with SB had significantly lower right masseter muscle thickness at rest (p = 0.036) and during clenching (p = 0.019). In the analysis based on OSA severity, patients with severe OSA showed significantly greater thickness in the right masseter muscle at rest (p = 0.009) and during clenching (p = 0.022), as well as in the left temporalis muscle at rest (p = 0.017) and during clenching (p = 0.026). However, no significant differences were found in muscle stiffness values across any of the groups (p > 0.05).
conclusionsThese findings suggest that while muscle thickness may reflect structural adaptations in OSA and SB, stiffness measurements via SWE did not differentiate between groups, highlighting the need for further research on its clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.