ArticleBMC oral health2026
Long-term clinical remission in rapidly recurrent maxillary osteosarcoma treated with anlotinib-based multimodal therapy: a case report.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteosarcoma of the jaw is a rare clinical entity characterized by a high propensity for local recurrence, for which surgical resection serves as the primary treatment modality. However, achieving negative margins in the maxilla is often complicated by the proximity of critical neurovascular and orbital structures. Furthermore, in certain emergency scenarios, surgical compromises may precipitate suboptimal initial control and rapid disease progression. This presents a significant therapeutic dilemma, particularly given the lack of standardized management guidelines for refractory cases. CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old male underwent emergency orbital decompression for a vision-threatening maxillary mass. One month later, rapid recurrence near the skull base compressed the optic nerve. Due to the risks of hemorrhage and iatrogenic neural injury from re-biopsy, and the patient’s refusal to accept the risk of jeopardizing his preserved vision, a diagnosis of clinicoradiological recurrence was established based on multiparametric MRI (specifically quantitative ADC analysis) and multidisciplinary consensus. The patient received salvage therapy comprising radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and Anlotinib. Over a 48-month follow-up period, the patient achieved complete radiological remission.
conclusionsWhile the emergency intervention successfully preserved vision, it also highlights the risks of deviating from standard oncologic principles, which likely precipitated the rapid recurrence. However, the primary significance of this report is to demonstrate that in refractory cases where salvage surgery is contraindicated, an aggressive multimodal strategy—integrating radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and Anlotinib—may serve as a viable salvage option. These findings warrant further validation in prospective trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.